hwacertified.blogg.se

Fortify vs sonarqube
Fortify vs sonarqube





fortify vs sonarqube

This allows teams to use SonarQube in their existing development workflow and take advantage of its powerful code analysis capabilities. Integrating with other tools: SonarQube can be integrated with a wide range of development tools and programming languages, such as Git, Maven, and Java.This makes it easy for developers to understand and address issues in the code. Providing actionable insights: SonarQube provides detailed information about issues in the code, including the file and line number where the issue occurs and the severity of the issue.This can help teams understand the quality of their code and identify areas that need improvement.

fortify vs sonarqube

  • Measuring code quality: SonarQube can measure a wide range of code quality metrics, such as cyclomatic complexity, duplicated code, and code coverage.
  • It uses static analysis to analyze the code and identify potential issues, and it can also integrate with dynamic analysis tools to provide even more detailed analysis.
  • Detecting bugs and vulnerabilities: SonarQube can identify a wide range of bugs and vulnerabilities in code, such as null pointer exceptions, SQL injection, and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
  • Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST).
  • Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).
  • Professional Employer Organizations (PEO).
  • Hope that helps, if you have further questions, send me a PM or ask it here. In my experience, they compliment each other nicely. Sonarqube picks up more syntax/logic related issues, with some vulnerability stuff mixed in. After pouring over results from both, Fortify picks up more vulnerability related items. My personal take is that you should use both. Lastly, we have to talk about Fortify vs. Once the scan is complete, it'll send the results over to the main portal/reporting server and you can again use the API calls to shut that instance down.

    fortify vs sonarqube

    If it has good computing power, even with large code bases, it shouldn't take more than a couple hours to scan. To do this, use Jenkins to make API calls to spin up the scanning machine image just before you start the scan. Secondly, then spin up another very strong image, which will only be active during scans.

    fortify vs sonarqube

    One is a medium-light strength image, which will hold Fortify portal and reporting. I suggest the following.Īssuming you have access to AWS or Azure, spin up two images. And if you code base is sizeable, you'll need a strong machine to cut through it quickly. With Fortify, it's a resource intensive tool by nature. As others have mentioned, Fortify and most scan tools don't just scan the delta of files changed.







    Fortify vs sonarqube